Anthemism is the idea of founding a country based on Objectivist philosophy, with governance by laissez-faire Capitalism. The term is inspired by Ayn Rand’s Anthem, in which the protagonists escape a collectivist society to start anew. You don’t need to be an Objectivist to be an Anthemist—only to believe this vision is feasible and worth pursuing.
Image from Amazon
Anthem
The term “Athemism” originates from the title of Ayn Rand’s novelette Anthem. This inspiring work, written in poetic prose, is read by thousands of high school students each year through the Ayn Rand Institute’s Books for Teachers program. From the book cover:
“Anthem has long been hailed as one of Ayn Rand’s classic novels, and a clear predecessor to her later masterpieces, The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. In Anthem, Rand examines a frightening future in which individuals have no name, no independence, and no values. Equality 7-2521 lives in the dark ages of the future where all decisions are made by committee, all people live in collectives, and all traces of individualism have been wiped out.”
“A new generation has discovered that Rand’s Anthem is more socially relevant today than it was when it was written seventy-five years ago. Anthem is the classic story about the consequences of social collectivism and the importance of individualism. Anthem has been described as ‘one of the most important prose poems ever written.’”
“In her usage of the English language she combines clarity of expression with prose of poetic grace. Here, indeed, is an anthem-an anthem, not in the idiom of music, but in the more difficult medium of words alone. This is the most beautiful, the most inspiring novel this reviewer has ever read. It is an ethical and philosophical rather than a religious dedication to freedom and the individual.” — Joan DeArmond, Fact Forum News
“Reading this inspired little story is a rewarding and satisfying experience which no American should deny himself.” — All-American Books
From The Founder
My name is Boris Reitman. In my twenties, I stumbled upon Atlas Shrugged after three people recommended it to me. One was a tech guy, another was a free spirited young woman who wrote poetry, and another was a sophisticated woman executive. I found it so surprising that such different types of people could like the same book, that I decided to read it out of curiosity. I finished it in a month, but it took me a few years to digest it. I thought about starting a Galt’s Gulch-like society, but there was, and still is, no technological way to hide it, as it was done in the novel.
Most American Objectivists think that the way forward is to try to change the United States for the better, by spreading ideas through books, media and private education. I don’t disagree, but in such a large country the process could take hundreds of years. I celebrate these efforts, but at a distance. I think it’s better to try to create a new country. It sounds crazy, but it is not impossible. In the last 100 years, several new countries have been created.
If you are frustrated with how things are, I invite you to get onboard with Anthemism. If we don’t take action, our children will face the same situation we are in once they reach maturity, and the cycle will repeat.
Recent Articles
How To Get Sovereignty
The first question anyone asks about creating a new state is, “Where will it be?” To answer this, let’s heed the advice given to entrepreneurs: find someone with a problem and get in front of him with a solution.
Which regions have a problem? The First World countries do not have a pressing one. Although they have not achieved the level of freedom that Objectivists advocate, their population is frogs in slowly heated water—unaware of the danger until it is too late, too used to the status quo to support any radical changes.
Why It Isn't Minarchism
Libertarians claim that Minarchism is the same political system as laissez-faire Capitalism. It is not. To understand what libertarians mean when they advocate for Minarchism, it is important to consider their perspective on how it compares to Statism and Anarchism, and how the size of government factors into it. This is how they see it:
The diagram shows a spectrum based on government size. On one end is statism—large government—while the other end represents anarchism, where no government exists. Minarchism, sits between these two, suggesting a government whose size should be reduced, but not entirely abolished.
Facing the Challenges of Muslim Immigration
The immigration policy of a rights-protecting state must uphold the principle of the Presumption of Innocence. This state should maintain open borders, allowing individuals to enter, live, and work freely. Invariably, it will attract significant Muslim immigration in search of greater freedoms.
The sanctity of individual rights requires that nonconsensual physical force be prohibited. Yet, there are Muslims who want to enforce Islam through such force. How can this threat be addressed?