Interesting how everyone’s happy with Grokipedia, without even noticing the major issue: in many articles, the text isn’t actually supported by the sources it cites. What’s the point of citing sources, then?
Wikipedia gives its editors access to the Wikipedia Library, meaning they get free access to most contemporary works from the Western world (and beyond). The possibility of earning something from editing has really driven the project…
For example, the sources for “White pride” state that it’s a white supremacist and neo-Nazi slogan, yet the article says something different. Might as well have skipped citing the source altogether